| Re: Software Maintenance [message #132543 is a reply to message #132431] |
Thu, 27 October 2016 21:01   |
TheFirewallGuy
Messages: 14
Registered: February 2014
|
|
|
|
Since the actual licencing costs for ActiveSync aren't very much (when someone like Kerio does it on a large scale), why doesn't Kerio offer an alternative maintenance fee that only covers ActiveSync? The initial purchase cost only appears to be $2/user/year. It would be a low enough cost that people wouldn't complain (too much) and Kerio wouldn't lose any money on it.
I support several companies that use Kerio. They always fall into 2 camps. One wants to upgrade every time there is a new version (and thus pays the maintenance) and the other wants to find a version that works and stick with it until it doesn't work.
I am disappointed that Kerio will be forcing a full maintenance cost if all you really want is ActiveSync.
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
