|
|
Re: maximum number of nat sessions? [message #140020 is a reply to message #140018] |
Wed, 30 May 2018 19:16   |
ipsys
Messages: 38 Registered: March 2018 Location: Burkina Faso
|
|
|
|
thankyou, please can i know why the connections are not being closed?

as you can see one host has 600,000+ connections. far greater than the 32,768 available to the nat?
also, as a result, i have enabled the security settings to limit the number of connections to 30,000, however, i see its possible to pass this?


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: maximum number of nat sessions? [message #140052 is a reply to message #140025] |
Fri, 01 June 2018 16:49  |
ipsys
Messages: 38 Registered: March 2018 Location: Burkina Faso
|
|
|
|
actually at the time of writing, there were no exceptions. my screenshot above of the security settings were the only security settings that were enabled. i set the limit as high as i did because under the client list, i was seeing 80,000+ connections. as it turns out, this number doesnt appear to be correct because when i click on the connections tab it only reports up to 1211 'items' (you can see this in my screenshots above). it gives a false sense of the real situation with this number only incrementing. also, under 'active connections' it never passed some 5x,xxx items. it does look like this limitation is global - its to say that if i have many public ip, using nat and load balancing, i still encounter this problem.
since this problem surfaced, i have gone back to routing our network through the kerio to another device, as we didnt have this problem before we start to use the nat on the kerio; we were hoping to remove a hop.
but thankyou very much for your help. what i have also done (as i was never aware of this limitation of nat - this is my first time to hit this wall (or even get close to it)) is to nat some clients via a port in the kerio and put the bulk of the traffic to the other device. this will only buy some time as the number of hosts in our network increases.
|
|
|