GFI Software Aurea SMB Solutions


Home » GFI User Forums » Kerio Control » Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names (Validation Failed (Interface names are not matching.) - BUT SAME INTERFACE NAMES!!)
Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names [message #146847] Thu, 17 October 2019 09:34 Go to next message
Jabba is currently offline  Jabba
Messages: 51
Registered: January 2007
Location: Italy
Hi guys,


yesterday i setup 2 Kerio Control VMs ( one was in production) and the second was a new VMs.
Both with Kerio Control 9.3.1 same build.
I checked all interface names, all 3 interfaces has the same name.
I followed che guide in gfi site, step by step.

1 ETH for WAN
1 ETH for LAN
1 ETH for HB

Connection is ok, but i receive this issue ( Validation Failed (Interface names are not matching.) )

Any one with my same problem ?
Re: Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names [message #146852 is a reply to message #146847] Thu, 17 October 2019 21:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ian.bugeja is currently offline  ian.bugeja
Messages: 455
Registered: March 2017
Location: Malta
can you check promiscuous mode for the network interfaces and ensure it's Allow All ?

https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/1004099?CoveoV2.CoveoLightni ngApex.getInitializationData=1&r=2&other.KM_Utility. getArticleDetails=1&other.KM_Utility.getArticleMetadata= 1&other.KM_Utility.getUrl=1&other.KM_Utility.getUser =1&other.KM_Utility.getAllTranslatedLanguages=1&ui-c omm-runtime-components-aura-components-siteforce-qb.Quarterb ack.validateRoute=1


Ian Bugeja
GFI Software
Re: Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names [message #146854 is a reply to message #146852] Fri, 18 October 2019 10:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jabba is currently offline  Jabba
Messages: 51
Registered: January 2007
Location: Italy
Configuration changes on both esx hosts.

Same issue.

Any other idea ?

Take a look of attached configurations of both Kerio Control Interfaces.

Thanks.

[Updated on: Fri, 18 October 2019 10:24]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names [message #146880 is a reply to message #146854] Tue, 22 October 2019 21:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ian.bugeja is currently offline  ian.bugeja
Messages: 455
Registered: March 2017
Location: Malta
Can you show identical columns please I need to see ethX for each interface?

Ian Bugeja
GFI Software
Re: Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names [message #146889 is a reply to message #146880] Wed, 23 October 2019 17:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jabba is currently offline  Jabba
Messages: 51
Registered: January 2007
Location: Italy
Yes, i can share this screenshot.
But in the first time, i had different ethx number from 1° Kerio to the 2° Kerio. I changed the ethx configuration and now all interfaces have the same ethx on both Kerio.

One important information:
the 1° Kerio Control VM it's in production from 3 month and i restored the configuration from the old Kerio Control NG300 that my customer had.

[Updated on: Wed, 23 October 2019 17:46]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names [message #146896 is a reply to message #146889] Thu, 24 October 2019 13:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ian.bugeja is currently offline  ian.bugeja
Messages: 455
Registered: March 2017
Location: Malta
Now i can see that all network interfaces are named the same so essentially HA should work.

if it is still not working please reach out to Support so that they can collect logs. It might have to do something with the backup/restore.


Ian Bugeja
GFI Software
Re: Kerio Contro VMs High Availability - different interface names [message #146904 is a reply to message #146896] Sat, 26 October 2019 12:33 Go to previous message
ehsan-nikavar is currently offline  ehsan-nikavar
Messages: 3
Registered: October 2019
Ian Bugeja
Many Thanks
Previous Topic: Content filter vs google.com
Next Topic: another network on DMZ interface
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Apr 02 22:11:51 CEST 2020

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03372 seconds