How to verify if eewiz.exe import was successful?

	Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Member List Search FAQ Ticket List Log Out

How to verify if eewiz.exe import was successful?

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Archiving & Fax] >> GFI MailArchiver >> How to verify if eewiz.exe import was successful?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

How to verify if eewiz.exe import was successful? - 8.Oct.2009 12:35:59 PM

centron

Posts: 4
Joined: 13.Mar.2009
Status: offline

Hello there,

We are experiencing a problem with a customer's account that has been manually imported using eewiz.exe

Due to the fact that this account was very large, the import itself has been running overnight. The next day, we noticed that our remote session on the server has been terminated by the customer itself.

Does eewiz log its progress of imported mail accounts? In its logfile, we just see lots of singe imported mails, but no mention of the accounts the mails belong to. Is there any chance that we can verify if all mails have been properly imported?

Additionally - if we would start the whole import process all over, would we experience duplicated e-mails in the user's archive afterwards?

Thanks in advance for any answers provided.

Post #: 1

RE: How to verify if eewiz.exe import was successful? - 11.Oct.2009 5:42:59 AM

ianb

Posts: 268
Status: offline

EEWiz is responsible to extract the emails from the Exchange/PST only. What you probably did was place the exported files in the Import Service (MAIS) pickup folder and these were imported automatically to the MailArchiver archive stores.

What you can do is to check that the emails count match from the MailArchiver archive store and the Exchange Mailbox/PST.

Please note that running the import again will lead to duplicate emails.

_____________________________

Ian Bugeja
Software Developer - GFI Software - www.gfi.com
Messaging, Content Security & Network Security Software

(in reply to centron)

Post #: 2