Can't seem to save to xml

	Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Member List Search FAQ Ticket List Log Out

Can't seem to save to xml

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Networking & Security] >> GFI LANguard >> Can't seem to save to xml

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Can't seem to save to xml - 25.Sep.2009 10:50:05 AM

MrShides

Posts: 5
Joined: 24.Sep.2009
Status: offline

The dialog box to save to xml comes up, I type in a name, and it saves a file with 0k with that name.

Any ideas?

Post #: 1

RE: Can't seem to save to xml - 25.Sep.2009 1:00:04 PM

DrewE

Posts: 1058
Joined: 28.Apr.2008
From: Cary, NC
Status: offline

What build of GFI Languard are you using ?

_____________________________

Drew Easley - Technical Support Representative
GFI Software - www.gfi.com

(in reply to MrShides)

Post #: 2

RE: Can't seem to save to xml - 26.Sep.2009 7:58:01 AM

MrShides

Posts: 5
Joined: 24.Sep.2009
Status: offline

Version: 9.0
Build: 20090313

(in reply to DrewE)

Post #: 3

RE: Can't seem to save to xml - 26.Sep.2009 8:25:19 AM

MrShides

Posts: 5
Joined: 24.Sep.2009
Status: offline

I've figured out that if my scan is "too big" (I haven't yet figured out what that limitation is) it will not save to xml.

I did a smaller scan of about 25 nodes and it worked fine.

(in reply to MrShides)

Post #: 4

RE: Can't seem to save to xml - 26.Sep.2009 8:56:33 AM

MrShides

Posts: 5
Joined: 24.Sep.2009
Status: offline

154 computers seemed to be to much.

(in reply to MrShides)

Post #: 5

RE: Can't seem to save to xml - 28.Sep.2009 9:31:46 AM

DrewE

Posts: 1058
Joined: 28.Apr.2008
From: Cary, NC
Status: offline

Will you please open a support request online at http://support.gfi.com/Support/support.aspx?lcode=en so we can best assist you?

Also, is there any AntiVirus software installed on the machine?

_____________________________

Drew Easley - Technical Support Representative
GFI Software - www.gfi.com

(in reply to MrShides)

Post #: 6