Feature Request

	Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Member List Search FAQ Ticket List Log Out

Feature Request

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Archiving & Fax] >> GFI MailArchiver >> Feature Request

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Feature Request - 22.Jul.2008 10:35:14 PM

TurningTechnologies

Posts: 19
Joined: 19.Aug.2007
Status: offline

I would like to voice a request for granting Group Access to User/Group Mailboxes.

Currently one can grant a user access to another user mailbox, and you can grant a user access to a group's mailboxes but not vice versa.

For example, I have a group called "SupportTeam" that contains all the members of our, yeah-- Support team. There is a Support mailbox, and to grant them access to it, I have to do it individually rather than giving access to SupportTeam.

Post #: 1

RE: Feature Request - 23.Jul.2008 12:26:09 AM

srakkhit

Posts: 77
Joined: 7.Feb.2006
Status: offline

Hi

I support you on this 100%. While ago I have requested this same thing, but GFI never responded.

Regards

(in reply to TurningTechnologies)

Post #: 2

RE: Feature Request - 28.Jul.2008 2:45:59 PM

John Letourneau

Posts: 1659
Joined: 28.Apr.2008
Status: offline

TurningTechnologies,

Just to let you know I did add this as a feature request for you. This does not mean that it will be present in a later build of GFI MailArchiver but these requests are taken very seriously. Thank you for your input.

_____________________________

Regards,
John Letourneau - Technical Support Team Lead
GFI Software - www.gfi.com

(in reply to srakkhit)

Post #: 3

RE: Feature Request - 28.Jul.2008 8:47:14 PM

TurningTechnologies

Posts: 19
Joined: 19.Aug.2007
Status: offline

Thanks for the feedback, John.

I have seen the improvements to MailArchiver over the past few years, and that is why I chose the product for our business. I have no doubt that GFI will continue to offer these types of improvements.

Regards,
Aaron

(in reply to John Letourneau)

Post #: 4