GFI
English Deutsch Français Italiano Nederlands Español
Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Member List  Search  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

 

Why exactly was it caught as spam?

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Content Security] >> GFI MailEssentials for Exchange/SMTP >> Why exactly was it caught as spam? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Why exactly was it caught as spam? - 26.Sep.2008 10:51:31 AM   
nachtmsk

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 26.Sep.2008
Status: offline
Hi,

I'm evaluating MailEssentials.

Is there a way for me to tell with each individual message, why it was classified as spam or HAM for that matter.
I'm used to working with Spamassassin. SA will re-write the header with information as to which rules were triggered and also what Baysian rating that particular piece of email received.

I ask this because I'd like an easy way to determine why a message was received as spam -- easier then looking through the message and figuring out which keyword or phrase might have triggered it being marked as spam.

Also, if there is a particular message marked as spam, is there a shortcut for me to re-input that message into my PICKUP folder and have it completely bypass all spam filters? (Currently I have spam being saved in a central folder on the server and not going to users boxes).

Thanks!
Mike
Post #: 1
RE: Why exactly was it caught as spam? - 26.Sep.2008 11:41:47 AM   
RSP

 

Posts: 450
Joined: 31.Oct.2006
From: UK
Status: offline
This might help: http://kbase.gfi.com/showarticle.asp?id=KBID001892

Alternatively, enable logging on all the modules and look through the log files.

Another file that is useful is ase_action.gfi_log.txt in the debuglogs folder, but you may need to enable debugging first in the registry

(in reply to nachtmsk)
Post #: 2
RE: Why exactly was it caught as spam? - 26.Sep.2008 12:00:19 PM   
nachtmsk

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 26.Sep.2008
Status: offline
Thanks RSP. That information is very useful.
I'm curious, have you enabled the registry change mentioned in that KB article?
Are there any downsides? Does the re-write of the header slow the server up?

Thanks again,

Mike

(in reply to RSP)
Post #: 3
RE: Why exactly was it caught as spam? - 26.Sep.2008 12:04:34 PM   
RSP

 

Posts: 450
Joined: 31.Oct.2006
From: UK
Status: offline
I do not require that change as I tag spam and use the rules wizard on most installations.

Run IISRESET after making the change for it to become effective.

I don't think it will change the load on the server, incidentally.

Debugging will add load though, but the main concern I have with that is disk space!

< Message edited by RSP -- 26.Sep.2008 12:06:02 PM >

(in reply to nachtmsk)
Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Content Security] >> GFI MailEssentials for Exchange/SMTP >> Why exactly was it caught as spam? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


   © 2008. All rights reserved. GFI Software Home Products Download Trials Support Ordering Site Map About Us Contact us
GFI solutions: Exchange anti spam filter - exchange anti virus - isa server - network vulnerability scanner - event log management - USB security software - exchange archiving - fax server software