Why W3C not show some fields?

	Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Member List Search FAQ Ticket List Log Out

Why W3C not show some fields?

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Networking & Security] >> GFI EventsManager >> Why W3C not show some fields?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Why W3C not show some fields? - 9.Apr.2008 7:12:54 AM

vasabi

Posts: 12
Score: 0
Joined: 5.Mar.2008
Status: offline

Why in W3C section not show some fields in W3C Events Browser?
such as

C-IP, Cs-Username, Servername, Extra fields. and etc.

It's show Date,Time only but incorrect data all events same time and date

I got this log from "Mail Server".I dont' know how to solve this problem.Someone can help me?

I got log from Mail and Proxy but in Proxy Log it's complete data all fileds. Had problem in Mail only.

Someone can help?

Thank you.

Post #: 1

RE: Why W3C not show some fields? - 10.Apr.2008 6:33:09 AM

Sven Berger

Posts: 184
Score: 0
Joined: 25.Feb.2008
Status: offline

Hi vasabi,

can you confirm that the CS-Username, Servername, etc. are actually in the raw message?

There are many different type of W3C Logs that Eventsmanager will display in the same window. Not all Types of Logs have the same type of information. Therefore we have more fields avalable that there are in any one message.

_____________________________

Sven Berger
GFI Software - www.gfi.com
Messaging, Content Security & Network Security Software

(in reply to vasabi)

Post #: 2

RE: Why W3C not show some fields? - 13.Apr.2008 4:42:51 AM

vasabi

Posts: 12
Score: 0
Joined: 5.Mar.2008
Status: offline

Thank you. Sven Berger for replied

I'm confirm have Cs-Username, Servername in raw message.
Coz can get log from Proxy and can display, but can get log from Exchange Server but cann't display it.

And in SQL DataBase all logs look like duplicate all.
i.e. Date, Time, ID same first log is GFI collected.

Maybe this bug?

< Message edited by vasabi -- 16.Apr.2008 1:22:19 AM >

(in reply to vasabi)

Post #: 3