Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 28.Jun.2006 11:52:43 AM
|
|
|
TimothyGaray
Posts: 11
Joined: 10.Nov.2005
From: Lima, OH
Status: offline
|
If it isn't already, I would like a feature to be added to the request list for MailSecurity v10: whitelist options. It would be nice to be able to whitelist domains or sender addresses from any scanning options. Specifically we have an insurance provider that sends some sort of encrypted emails that the HTML Script Remover keeps taking out. I would prefer for the HTML Script Remover to be running but just skip the ones from the insurance provider. Thanks! -Tim
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 28.Jun.2006 11:58:14 AM
|
|
|
Mark Busuttil
Posts: 4836
Joined: 16.Oct.2005
Status: offline
|
This has been added as a feature request! Thank You!
_____________________________
Regards, Mark Busuttil GFI Software Ltd - www.gfi.com Messaging, Content Security & Network Security Software GFI: MailEssentials - MailSecurity - MailArchiver - FAXmaker - LANguard – WebMonitor
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 28.Jun.2006 12:33:28 PM
|
|
|
vlmagee
Posts: 6
Joined: 5.Jan.2006
Status: offline
|
If number of requests for a new feature makes a difference, please add me! Email blocking by Mail Security has caused us no end of grief. It has resulted in work delays because messages don't reach the recipient, and the sender doesn't know. It has caused me to use an old ISP email account to receive files that Mail Security thinks are "dangerous". Sometimes the file content is NOT invalid but Mail Security objects to it anyway*; usually we don't have the time to get traces to document the problem, so we resort to ISP email accounts or FTP. This is really very disruptive and time consuming. If you can move up implementation of this new feature, it would make us very happy. *The problem I am referring to here is one related to mp3s. Some mp3s, created by some levels of some audio editors, are considered malformed and are blocked by Mail Security. As I said, we were not able to take the time to run special tests to get a trace (the existing trace is always overwritten by the time the missing email message is noticed).
_____________________________
Regards, Valerie Magee
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 29.Jun.2006 8:55:07 AM
|
|
|
Mark Busuttil
Posts: 4836
Joined: 16.Oct.2005
Status: offline
|
Thank you for your feedback!
_____________________________
Regards, Mark Busuttil GFI Software Ltd - www.gfi.com Messaging, Content Security & Network Security Software GFI: MailEssentials - MailSecurity - MailArchiver - FAXmaker - LANguard – WebMonitor
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 6.Jul.2006 11:53:34 AM
|
|
|
Papabrad
Posts: 26
Joined: 3.Apr.2005
Status: offline
|
You must be talking about the Aetna secure emails! I have been battling their support staff to change the way the send out the notifications. Form what I hear they have problems with anyone running any type of filtering package. I have been told by GFI support that whitelisting will not be a feature for the security module because spoofing of a whitelisted domain would allow a potential virus/worm past the filter. quote:
ORIGINAL: TimothyGaray If it isn't already, I would like a feature to be added to the request list for MailSecurity v10: whitelist options. It would be nice to be able to whitelist domains or sender addresses from any scanning options. Specifically we have an insurance provider that sends some sort of encrypted emails that the HTML Script Remover keeps taking out. I would prefer for the HTML Script Remover to be running but just skip the ones from the insurance provider. Thanks! -Tim
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 31.Aug.2006 4:16:56 PM
|
|
|
seanford
Posts: 2
Joined: 31.Aug.2006
Status: offline
|
What about whitelisting an IP address? I have a server that sends out 100's of emails to subscribers of a list.....MSEC bogs down while scanning all of these emails, which really don't need to be scanned. It would really help keep the GFIScanM process from taking over the CPU.
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 1.Sep.2006 4:35:03 AM
|
|
|
Mark Busuttil
Posts: 4836
Joined: 16.Oct.2005
Status: offline
|
Hi Seanford, thank you for your feedback, we have added this to the feature requests list! Thank You!
_____________________________
Regards, Mark Busuttil GFI Software Ltd - www.gfi.com Messaging, Content Security & Network Security Software GFI: MailEssentials - MailSecurity - MailArchiver - FAXmaker - LANguard – WebMonitor
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 1.Sep.2006 8:19:22 AM
|
|
|
Mats Bjur
Posts: 109
Joined: 9.Sep.2004
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: offline
|
This isn't uncommon, I'll ad my vote to this too.
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 23.Oct.2007 11:29:13 AM
|
|
|
onepeon
Posts: 6
Joined: 2.Mar.2007
Status: offline
|
I would like this option added also. I mean how many builds does it take to get to the center of a GFI whitelist? The world may never know... 12? 13? 14? We need more adminstrative control over our own email servers.
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 22.Jul.2009 2:29:30 PM
|
|
|
mrdon
Posts: 4
Joined: 17.Dec.2007
Status: offline
|
We are having the same problem here to. It's not just Aetna either, 4 other companies that we deal with have started doing the same thing, and we are having the same problem. I am going to have to look for another mail security system if there is not going to be a whitelist option or something that will fix this issue soon. All medical providers are being required to encrypt emails because of govt regulations, so this issue is going to become big....fast!
|
|
|
|
RE: Feature Request: Whitelist Options for MSEC10 - 7.Aug.2009 3:46:13 AM
|
|
|
Nicks
Posts: 2771
Joined: 17.Mar.2003
Status: offline
|
Hi, The possible implementation of this feature is currently being discussed in a separate thread. Your feedback would be greatly appreciated. We have taken note of what has been discussed below. If you would like to provide additional feedback, kindly do so at http://forums.gfi.com/FEATURE_REQUEST_UPDATE_-_Whitelist/m_900768978/tm.htm. P.S. this thread will be closed, so that any additional feedback will be provided in one thread.
_____________________________
Nicholas Sciberras GFI Software Blog-Twitter-YouTube-Facebook
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|