Display processing result in Monitor?
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
Display processing result in Monitor? - 9.Apr.2007 8:37:39 PM
|
|
|
GeeZuZz
Posts: 14
Joined: 23.Jan.2005
Status: offline
|
It would be very useful if Mailessentials monitor could display WHAT it did with the message, instead of just "Item processed ok". That shouldn't be too hard to implement?
I mean it could say:quote:
Catched by Bayesian
Item processed OK
Or:quote:
Catched by Keyword Checking
Keyword Blockedword was found in body
Item processed OK
Or in case of ham:quote:
Item passed all tests - normal delivery
Item processed OK
< Message edited by GeeZuZz -- 9.Apr.2007 8:38:58 PM >
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 9.Apr.2007 8:46:45 PM
|
|
|
turingtest2
Posts: 159
Joined: 16.Jan.2007
Status: offline
|
Seconded...
Processing results in x-headers would be great too.
tt2
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 10.Apr.2007 3:24:06 AM
|
|
|
Patrizia
Posts: 8474
Joined: 18.Aug.2003
From: Malta
Status: offline
|
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback! Your reuqests have been added to the feature request list.
_____________________________
Patrizia Caruana
GFI Software - www.gfi.com
Messaging, Content Security & Network Security Software
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 10.Apr.2007 8:57:52 AM
|
|
|
egypt123
Posts: 19
Joined: 4.Dec.2006
Status: offline
|
Yes, this would be very nice. I'd like to see it on the Subject line as well. For example, when I first implemented the system, I had everything going to the users Inbox but had the Spam mail flagged in the Subject line (i.e., Bayesian: You won a Million Bucks!!). However, once you start sending the Spam to the Junk Folder, it no longer puts the processing filter text on the Subject line. This would be a quick visual way to tell which filter is catching it (without having to open the message or dig through the monitor) and would be helpful for making quick adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 10.Apr.2007 2:44:46 PM
|
|
|
justinr
Posts: 129
Joined: 6.Mar.2006
From: New York, NY
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: egypt123
Yes, this would be very nice. I'd like to see it on the Subject line as well. For example, when I first implemented the system, I had everything going to the users Inbox but had the Spam mail flagged in the Subject line (i.e., Bayesian: You won a Million Bucks!!). However, once you start sending the Spam to the Junk Folder, it no longer puts the processing filter text on the Subject line. This would be a quick visual way to tell which filter is catching it (without having to open the message or dig through the monitor) and would be helpful for making quick adjustments.
see here:
Can GFI MailEssentials provide a reason why an email was blocked as SPAM?
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 10.Apr.2007 6:42:50 PM
|
|
|
turingtest2
Posts: 159
Joined: 16.Jan.2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: justinr
see here:
Can GFI MailEssentials provide a reason why an email was blocked as SPAM?
Thanks for the kb reference, but wouldn't this be easier for users to configure with a check box on the Actions tab? Feature request anybody? Like many, I suspect, I tend to explore the visible features of a program to discover what it can do and only resort to manuals etc. when all else fails. The downside of this approach is that one can miss concepts or extra "features" that only appear in the documentation.
tt2
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 11.Apr.2007 11:32:49 AM
|
|
|
justinr
Posts: 129
Joined: 6.Mar.2006
From: New York, NY
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: turingtest2
Thanks for the kb reference, but wouldn't this be easier for users to configure with a check box on the Actions tab? Feature request anybody?
i agree, this should just be a checkbox/option. there's no reason to bury something that basically everyone wants to use.
not holding my breath for implementation, though.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 12.Apr.2007 6:46:22 AM
|
|
|
Mark Busuttil
Posts: 4833
Joined: 16.Oct.2005
Status: offline
|
Thank you for your feedback, this has also been added as a feature request.
Thank you
_____________________________
Regards,
Mark Busuttil - support@gfi.com
GFI Software Ltd - www.gfi.com
Messaging, Content Security & Network Security Software
GFI: MailEssentials - MailSecurity - MailArchiver - FAXmaker - LANguard – WebMonitor
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 16.Jun.2007 3:23:26 PM
|
|
|
coolfactor
Posts: 29
Joined: 15.Jun.2007
Status: offline
|
I agree the GFI Monitor doesn't go far enough. I know it needs to be fast and lightweight, but I'd like to know:
- number of messages processed per minute on average
- number of messages in queue, waiting to be processed, from GFI's perspective. When I check the Queue folder, it hovers around 117 all day, and that doesn't make sense to me. Are certain messages queued for delivery at a later time?
I'm not entirely familiar with all the ins and outs of MailEssentials yet, so you answers on this would help a lot. I've been trying to figure out why entire batches of obvious spam get through the filters, and my best guess is that the Queue is full, so MailEssentials lets the rest through unscanned to ensure quick delivery.
Am I getting into a different topic here? LOL. Bottom line is that I can't extract enough details from GFI Monitor to know what is going on and why.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Display processing result in Monitor? - 8.Jun.2008 10:01:32 PM
|
|
|
GeeZuZz
Posts: 14
Joined: 23.Jan.2005
Status: offline
|
Was this feature (first post) ever implemented in MailEssentials?
(We're not using MailEssential for the moment, but would still like to know)
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Printable Version
